@article {1728,
	title = {Movement Patterns in Dung Beetles and in the Dung Fly},
	journal = {Animal Behaviour},
	volume = {28},
	number = {AUG},
	year = {1980},
	note = {KG601ANIM BEHAV},
	pages = {953-964},
	keywords = {Dung beetles},
	url = {<Go to ISI>://A1980KG60100033},
	author = {Hanski, I.}
}
@article {1818,
	title = {Behavioural dynamics of biparental care in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus},
	journal = {Animal Behaviour},
	volume = {64},
	year = {2002},
	note = {Times Cited: 0Cited Reference Count: 91Cited References:      AGRAWAL AF, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P1710     ALATALO RV, 1982, ANIM BEHAV, V30, P585     ALATALO RV, 1988, ORNIS SCAND, V19, P31     AXELROD R, 1988, SCIENCE, V242, P1385     AXELROD R, 1981, SCIENCE, V211, P1390     BART J, 1989, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V24, P109     BEDARD J, 1983, CAN J ZOOL, V61, P2836     BOYD R, 1992, COALITIONS ALLIANCES, P473     BOYD R, 1989, J THEOR BIOL, V136, P47     BOYD R, 1987, NATURE, V327, P58     CHASE ID, 1980, AM NAT, V115, P827     CLUTTONBROCK TH, 1991, EVOLUTION PARENTAL C     COOK D, 1988, AUST J ZOOL, V36, P521     COOK D, 1987, AUST J ZOOL, V35, P123     COTTON PA, 1996, BEHAV ECOL, V7, P178     DAVIES NB, 1985, ANIM BEHAV, V33, P628     DRENT RH, 1980, ARDEA, V68, P225     DUNN PO, 1989, AUK, V106, P635     DUNN PO, 1992, BEHAV ECOL, V3, P291     EMLEN DJ, 1996, EVOLUTION, V50, P1219     FREEMANGALLANT CR, 1998, BEHAV ECOL, V9, P486     GODFRAY HCJ, 1991, NATURE, V352, P328     GOLDSTEIN H, 1988, ARDEA, V76, P169     GREENLAW JS, 1985, ANIM BEHAV, V33, P373     HALFFTER G, 1982, NESTING BEHAV DUNG B     HEMBORG C, 1999, J ANIM ECOL, V68, P429     HEMBORG C, 1998, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V265, P2003     HIRSHLEIFER J, 1988, J CONFLICT RESOLUT, V32, P367     HOLSTEIN V, 1942, DUEHOGEN     HOUSTON AI, 1985, BEHAV ECOLOGY ECOLOG, P471     HUNT J, 1998, BEHAV ECOL, V9, P465     HUNT J, 1998, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V42, P447     HUNT J, 1997, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V41, P109     HUNT J, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P936     HUNT J, IN PRESS J EVOLUTION     HUNT J, 2001, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V268, P2409     KEMP AC, 1988, BIRDS N AM, V13, P375     LAZARUS J, 1990, ANIM BEHAV, V39, P672     LEE JM, 1982, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V11, P38     LEFFELAAR D, 1986, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V18, P199     LEIMAR O, 1997, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V264, P1209     LEONARD M, 1996, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V38, P341     LOZANO GA, 1996, ANIM BEHAV 2, V51, P265     LYON BE, 1987, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V20, P377     MARKMAN S, 1995, ANIM BEHAV, V50, P655     MARKMAN S, 1996, ANIM BEHAV 3, V52, P437     MARTIN K, 1987, ANIM BEHAV, V35, P369     MAY RM, 1987, NATURE, V327, P15     MEEK SB, 1991, ANIM BEHAV, V42, P813     MOCZEK AP, 1999, BEHAV ECOL, V10, P641     MOLLER AP, 1991, ANIM BEHAV, V42, P261     MOLLER AP, 2000, BEHAV ECOL, V11, P161     MROWKA W, 1982, ANIM BEHAV, V30, P295     MULDAL AM, 1986, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V19, P105     MUMME RL, 1985, BEHAVIOUR, V95, P290     NOWAK M, 1990, J THEOR BIOL, V142, P237     NOWAK MA, 1992, NATURE, V359, P826     OTTOSSON U, 1997, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V41, P381     PRICE K, 1995, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V37, P201     QUINN JS, 1990, AUK, V274, P260     RIDLEY M, 1978, ANIM BEHAV, V26, P904     SAINO N, 1995, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V36, P151     SASVARI L, 1990, ORNIS SCAND, V21, P287     SHERRATT TN, 1998, J THEOR BIOL, V193, P167     SLAGSVOLD T, 1989, AM NAT, V134, P239     SLAGSVOLD T, 1997, AUK, V114, P593     SLAGSVOLD T, 1990, ECOLOGY, V71, P1258     SLAGSVOLD T, 1994, NATURE, V370, P136     SMITH HG, 1988, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V22, P447     SMITH JM, 1982, EVOLUTION THEORY GAM     SMITH JNM, 1982, AUK, V99, P555     SOWIG P, 1996, ECOL ENTOMOL, V21, P81     SVENSSON E, 1997, BEHAV ECOL, V8, P92     TIMM AM, 1975, Z TIERPSYCHOL, V39, P8     TRIVERS RL, 1971, Q REV BIOL, V46, P35     TRIVERS RL, 1972, SEXUAL SELECTION DES, P136     WEATHERHEAD PJ, 1979, AUK, V96, P391     WESTNEAT DF, 1996, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V11, P87     WHILLANS KV, 1990, ANIM BEHAV, V39, P869     WHITTINGHAM LA, 1993, AUK, V110, P240     WILLIAMS GC, 1966, AM NAT, V100, P687     WINKLER DW, 1987, AM NAT, V130, P526     WOLF L, 1990, ANIM BEHAV, V39, P125     WOLF L, 1988, ANIM BEHAV, V36, P1601     WRIGHT J, 1990, ANIM BEHAV, V40, P462     WRIGHT J, 1999, ANIM BEHAV 2, V58, P345     WRIGHT J, 1990, BEHAV ECOL, V1, P116     WRIGHT J, 1989, BEHAV ECOL SOCIOBIOL, V25, P171     WRIGHT J, 1998, J AVIAN BIOL, V29, P105     ZAR JH, 1985, BIOSTATISTICAL ANAL     ZEH DW, 1985, AM ZOOL, V25, P785EnglishArticle1605CEANIM BEHAV},
	month = {Jul},
	pages = {65-75},
	abstract = {In the dimorphic dung beetle Onthophagus taurus major males provide assistance during offspring provisioning. We examined the behavioural dynamics of biparental care to quantify directly how males and females allocate time to parental and nonparental behaviours and to determine whether parents adjust their level of investment relative to their partner{\textquoteright}s contribution. Females allocated more of their time budget to parental behaviours than males. The proportion of time females allocated to parental behaviours increased after oviposition while that of a male decreased. Male paternity assurance behaviours were negatively associated with male and female parental behaviours. Theoretical models predict that the investment provided by the members of a cooperative pair should be negatively correlated and that any shortfall of one parent should be partially compensated for by the other. In-the absence of a male, unassisted females allocated more time to parental care, and performed more parental behaviours. However, compensation was incomplete as unassisted females performed fewer parental behaviours than pairs, resulting in significantly lighter brood masses (the egg and its associated dung supply). Males performed more parental behaviours when paired with small females, and small females more than large females. Contrary to prediction, the investments provided by males and females in a cooperative pair were positively correlated. Males coordinated their parental behaviours with the females rather than acting independently. Since parental behaviours were directly related to the weight of brood masses, the observed parental interactions will have important fitness consequences in this species., (C) 2002 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.},
	keywords = {fluctuating asymmetry, male parental care, male-removal, orange-tufted, paternal investment, prisoners-dilemma game, red-winged blackbirds, reproductive, sexual conflict, success, sunbird, tree swallows},
	url = {<Go to ISI>://000178657200008},
	author = {Hunt, J. and Simmons, L. W.}
}
