@article {1567,
	title = {Diversity in the weapons of sexual selection: horn evolution in the beetle genus Onthophagus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)},
	journal = {Evolution},
	volume = {59},
	number = {5},
	year = {2005},
	month = {Jan},
	pages = {1060-1084},
	abstract = {Both ornaments and weapons of sexual selection frequently exhibit prolific interspecific diversity of form. Yet, most studies of this diversity have focused on ornaments involved with female mate choice, rather than on the weapons of male competition. With few exceptions, the mechanisms of divergence in weapon morphology remain largely unexplored. Here, we characterize the evolutionary radiation of one type of weapon: beetle horns. We use partial sequences from four nuclear and three mitochondrial genes to develop a phylogenetic hypothesis for a worldwide sample of 48 species from the dung beetle genus Onthophagus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). We then use these data to test for multiple evolutionary origins of horns and to characterize the evolutionary radiation of horns. Although our limited sampling of one of the world{\textquoteright}s most species-rich genera almost certainly underestimates the number of evolutionary events, our phylogeny reveals prolific evolutionary lability of these exaggerated sexually selected weapons (more than 25 separate gains and losses of five different horn types). We discuss these results in the context of the natural history of these beetles and explore ways that sexual selection and ecology may have interacted to generate this extraordinary diversity of weapon morphology. },
	keywords = {Adaptive radiation, beetle horns, character divergence, male competition, Onthophagus, phylogeny, sexual selection, weapons.},
	author = {Emlen, Douglas J. and Marangelo, Jennifer and Ball, Bernard and Cunningham, Clifford}
}
@article {1569,
	title = {The development and evolution of exaggerated morphologies in insects},
	journal = {Annual Review of Entomology},
	volume = {45},
	year = {2000},
	pages = {661-708},
	abstract = {We discuss a framework for studying the evolution of morphology in insects, based on the concepts of {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}phenotypic plasticity{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}reaction norms.{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} We illustrate this approach with the evolution of some of the most extreme morphologies in insects: exaggerated, sexually selected male ornaments and weapons, and elaborate social insect soldier castes. Most of these traits scale with body size, and these scaling relationships are often nonlinear. We argue that scaling relationships are best viewed as reaction norms, and that the evolution of exaggerated morphological traits results from genetic changes in the slope and/or shape of these scaling relationships. After reviewing literature on sexually selected and caste-specific structures, we suggest two possible routes to the evolution of exaggerated trait dimensions: (a) the evolution of steeper scaling relationship slopes and (b) the evolution of sigmoid or discontinuous scaling relationship shapes. We discuss evolutionary implications of these two routes to exaggeration and suggest why so many of the most exaggerated insect structures scale nonlinearly with body size. Finally, we review literature on insect development to provide a comprehensive picture of how scaling relationships arise and to suggest how they may be modified through evolution.},
	keywords = {allometry, castes, Polyphenism, sexual selection, threshold traits},
	author = {Emlen, Douglas J. and Nijhout, H. Frederik}
}
