Publication Type: | Journal Article |
Year of Publication: | 2004 |
Authors: | M. L. Castillo, Lobo J. M. |
Journal: | Biodiversity and Conservation |
Volume: | 13 |
Pagination: | 1257-1269 |
Date Published: | Jun |
Accession Number: | ISI:000220213500002 |
Keywords: | forest change biodiversity dung beetles |
Abstract: | Comparison of the diversity and community structure of Coleoptera (Passalidae) collected in Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico, in primary and secondary tropical forest has been carried out. The saproxylophagous beetles studied can be differentiated according to their presence in three distinct microhabitats of rotting logs: underbark, sapwood - heartwood and microhabitat generalists. Over the 2-year study period, 12 passalid species were recorded (six Passalini and six Proculini) represented by a total of 2971 individuals, collected from 234 rotting logs. The rarefaction method, the lognormal species - abundance relationship, and the nonparametric jackknife method were used to compare species richness between the habitats. The data were also fitted to log series, truncated lognormal, geometric, and broken-stick species abundance models to detect changes in community structure. The community composition of Passalidae in Los Tuxtlas did not differ ostensibly between the primary and secondary forests. Neither the mean number of individuals nor the biomass per log differed significantly. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the two habitats in terms of the number of underbark, sapwood/heartwood, and microhabitat generalist species. Different richness estimators indicated that the primary forest community is only slightly richer. The slight decrease in richness of the secondary forest is related to a decrease in dominance by certain species, as well as to a more balanced abundance distribution, which is adequately described by the broken-stick model. Complementary explanations for this pattern may be: ( 1) that logging reduces the abundance of dominant species, thus preventing competitive exclusion in the secondary forest; and ( 2) that passalid diversity is not regulated by the diversity of tree species. |
URL: | <Go to ISI>://000220213500002 |
Alternate Journal: | Biodivers. Conserv. |